Maybe I'm behind on the design here, but has the precedence been set to use wired sensors? Or wireless?
If the space for the sensor and housing was routed into the top bar, that would allow the most usability and a modular type system to move the sensors anywhere in the hive to get results at different parts of the hive.

A system that just gave readings on the weight of each frame would be a data point I'd be interested. It could give researchers an idea of the honey to brood ratios as well as day to day traffic patterns which is an excellent indicator of health. It would have the added benefit of letting hobbyists know when it was time to add frames.

I would choose higher fidelity sound monitoring over weight of frames though. What about a weight system that ran the length of the hive underneath the frames on the lip of whatever the frames rest on. It could easily connect to the "frame" that houses all the other sensors.

For Langstroth hives, a sensor system integrated into a slatted rack might be an option. Those would fit well in an awful lot of commercial hives.

We've started with wired sensors, because that's the most straightforward path. It's possible we'll use multiple wireless sensor nodes in the future that communicate via Bluetooth LE to a central microcontroller that broadcasts data to our servers via wifi. More to come, but yes, it's all wired at the moment.

Colorado Top Bar - v6.1 - Interior Dimensions

Note: The vertical height from the bottom of the hive to the bottom of the top bar is 8.76".

CTB - v6.1 - Top Bar Dimensions

Note: On the right, the 0.27" dimension refers to the space between the comb and the outside edge of the top bar. This is based on an average comb width of 20.20 mm (source).

Colorado Top Bar - v6.1 - Alpha Kit Sensor Case Dimensions

• Top: 17.77" / 451.358 mm
• Bottom: 7.10" / 180.34 mm
• Sides: 10.12" / 257.048 mm
• Width: minimum 3" / 76.2 mm

Determining Width Requirements

• Bee Spacing: 0.27" x 2 = 0.54" / 13.716 mm (source)
• Breadboard: 0.33" / 8.5 mm (source)
• DHT22: 0.988" / 25.1 mm (source)
• Standoffs: .375" / 9.525 mm (source)
• Wall Thickness: 0.125" x 2 = 0.25" / 6.35 mm
• Total: 2.533" / 64.34 mm

Alpha Sensor Case - 01 by on Sketchfab

Critique of v0.1

1. The model above doesn't allow for bee spacing. Currently, the top and bottom pieces pass through the side walls. It needs to be the opposite way - the side walls need to pass through the top and bottom, and the top piece needs to be wide enough to account for bee space.

2. There's a gap on the left side at the bottom for some reason. It's not wide enough.

Re: Preventing RFI
(see this thread elsewhere in the forum)

If this box is inserted at the entrance of the hive, the case's back side, which faces the brood, could be shielded, and the front face would be directed towards the wifi router. So, the front of the hive would need to face the wifi router.

Incredible Schematic

• The black box is the CTB
• The yellow area is the majority of the bee colony
• The orange box is the sensor case
• the red line is the shielding on the back of the sensor case
• the green arrows are the wifi signal
• the blue box is the wifi router

If you shield the box completely, you defeat the purpose of putting the case inside the brood with a drop in design, because you can't broadcast your wifi. We should look at antennaes that can be mounted outside the hive - this came up with my discussion with Caleb today.

This design looks great - it looks as though it could be quite easily laser cut, though that brings up questions about materials again!

As for bee space, if we place the sensor bar at the front of the hive, bee space would likely only be a consideration for the inner facing wall. The outer facing wall could probably sit right up against the front section of the CTB. Of course we need to make sure there is room under the structure for bees to enter the hive.

Apparently this TF200 Thermo is pretty good at insulating against Wifi and other signals.

READ MORE HERE

Here is a (very rough) alternative design for an in-hive sensor container.

This design uses a u-shaped wooden frame, with mesh stabled on either face to sandwich the sensors inside. Supposed benefits might be easier flow of air through the container to more accurately measure humidity and temperature, though I'm not sure if the mesh would allow for accurate readings within the sandwiched space.

In this design, the sensor hangs independently from a top bar within the frame.

Feedback encouraged for either option!

CTB Entrance Dimensions

Barcelona Warre v2.4 Entrance Dimensions

Length: 3.149" / 80 mm

Height: 0.378" / 9.61 mm

Alpha Kit - v1.0 - Case Design

Introduction

The first design will be for the Colorado Top Bar. After testing, it will be modified for the Barcelona Warre. The case will have the following features:

1. Acrylic material - probably 1/4"
2. Snap-fit design
3. Prototyped on a laser cutter
4. Follows the interior contour of the hive
5. Drops in place like a normal top bar
6. Preserves bee space on either side - 3/8"
7. Maintains space at the bottom for bee movement beneath
8. Uses cable glands to allow wires to pass through
9. Uses holes for air ventilation for temperature & humidity detection
10. Uses standoffs to mount a perfboard as seen below
11. Is mounted at the front of the hive by the entrance taking the first slot
12. Uses the TF200 Thermo insulating membrane on the brood-facing wall to minimize wifi disturbance
13. Uses an exterior-mounted wifi antenna to concentrate radio waves in one area and away from the hive core.
14. Displays the Open Source Hardware Logo and/or OSBH logo in a prominent location as an engraving

Sensor Kit Mounting

Alpha Kit - v1.0 Schematic

The IR counter is nearing the testing phase. It will have its own case.

Image of the first test of the adapted Warré hive to fit in the sensors at the basement of the hive. You can access the sensor-kit by pulling out the board in the middle. The design also fixes the problem of bees building the combs to deep (till the entrance-level of the hive), using the slatted Rack idea mentioned above (thanks for that!).

first cnc-cut version

3D-sample of the position of the sensor-kit inside the basement (red).

Thanks,
Ron

Will the sensor be affected by the bees building comb and propolis on it??
What concerns do we have about wifi in the hive?

Hey Seneca,
a lot of people are using a net around the sensor to prevent it being coated with propolis.

I'm on the CAD design for the case for the sensor-kit right now. The idea would be to build up a box, which bees won't be able to enter. Sensors and cables which would go out of this box into the hive may could need such a net to be protected. Most important the humidity and acoustic sensors. Are there other possibilities to protect sensors from coating by bees?

best,
Ron